ABSTRACT
The text aims at questioning the meanings of school that appeared when COVID-19 was scattered in Brazil. Specifically, it analyzes the speeches in defense of guidelines to get back to face-to-face and hybrid classes in two state school systems in the North of Brazil. It is a bibliographical analysis in an approach with a discursive theoretical-methodological perspective, that seeks understanding the meanings of school that occurred as an antagonistic dispute for the setting of political articulations. The results demonstrate that the returning to classes guiding documents plot meanings related to the school in order to fulfil the minimum workload defined in legislation and the prescription of minimum content for learning, which is against education as a public right though. Overall, without a brooder discussion on the current pandemic moment in the definition of those guidelines for bask education, the existing educational inequalities might get even worse.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become one of the more dramatic health problems in the century. This disease has enormous consequence for the health care worldwide. In addition to high mortality rate, patients recovered from COVID-19 present short and long-term cardiovascular sequelae including chest pain, myocardial dysfunction, arrhythmia, dyspnea, breathlessness, postural tachycardia syndrome, and thrombotic complications. The explanations for these clinical manifestations are still uncertain but can involve a constellation of physiological alterations. Hypothesis: To test if COVID-19 survivors have augmented sympathetic outflow, diminished endothelial function, elevated aortic stiffness, and reduced physical capacity compared to healthy individuals. Methods: Nineteen COVID-19 survivors [age: 47.0±2.3 years, BMI: 30.1±1.2 Kg/m2] and eighteen well-matched healthy controls (age: 44.0±2.0 years, BMI: 28.4 ±1.2 Kg.m2] were included in study. COVID-19 survivors were evaluated within 6 months of original diagnosis by RT-PCR. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) from fibular nerve (Microneurography), brachial artery flowmediated dilation (BAFMD;Doppler-Ultrasound), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV;Complior), beat-to-beat blood pressure (Peripheral BP;Finometer), heart rate (HR;Electrocardiography) and peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak, Cardiopulmonary exercise testing) were measured in both groups. Results: MSNA was higher in COVID-19 survivors compared to controls (33.0±1.0 vs. 22.0±1.0 bursts/min, p=0.001). Both BAFMD and VO2peakwere lower in COVID-19 survivors compared to controls (4.6±0.7 vs. 8.2 ±0.8%, p=0.005 and 22.2±1.5 vs. 29.7±1.6 mL/Kg/min p=0.001, respectively). Although COVID-19 survivors had greater cf-PWV than controls (8.6±0.5 m/s vs. 7.4±0.4 m/s, p=0.03), BP and HR were not different between groups. Conclusions: Our study revealed that patients recently recovered from COVID-19 have abnormal neurovascular control, vascular alterations and reduced physical capacity. These findings strongly indicate the need of further long-term investigations to uncover cardiovascular sequelae provoked by COVID-19.